<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where wikipedia fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecommerce-blog.org/archives/where-wikipedia-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecommerce-blog.org/archives/where-wikipedia-fails/</link>
	<description>Ecommerce, Online Marketing, SEO, Web Design and Programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDK</title>
		<link>http://www.ecommerce-blog.org/archives/where-wikipedia-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-22059</link>
		<dc:creator>MDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecommerce-blog.org/archives/where-wikipedia-fails/#comment-22059</guid>
		<description>Agrees and disagrees. Most of the so called professionals; don&#039;t really know what they&#039;re talking about half of the time. They just borrow other sources from other pages, some can be inaccurate. I am a programmer and Engineer. I&#039;ve seen some Programming contents to be really inaccurate or ripped or out of content or inconclusive. 

Some are but some aren&#039;t. It is really hard to tell which is accurate and which is not. The problem is - do to its popularity and People are confining in Wikipedia for the answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agrees and disagrees. Most of the so called professionals; don&#8217;t really know what they&#8217;re talking about half of the time. They just borrow other sources from other pages, some can be inaccurate. I am a programmer and Engineer. I&#8217;ve seen some Programming contents to be really inaccurate or ripped or out of content or inconclusive. </p>
<p>Some are but some aren&#8217;t. It is really hard to tell which is accurate and which is not. The problem is &#8211; do to its popularity and People are confining in Wikipedia for the answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
